By Brian Figeroux, Esq. | Editorial credit: Yu Kuo-wei / shutterstock.com 

Haiti’s enduring political instability cannot be fully understood without examining the historical roles played by Western powers, notably the United States and France. President Donald Trump’s apparent indifference to Haiti’s turmoil, coupled with his administration’s immigration policies, reflects a broader pattern of disengagement and racial bias that has deep historical roots. This article explores the historical context of Western involvement in Haiti, analyzes the racial and immigration issues influencing U.S. policy, and examines the implications of the Trump administration’s stance toward Haiti.​

Historical Context: Western Interventions in Haiti

Haiti’s path has been profoundly shaped by foreign interventions that have hindered its development. After gaining independence from France in 1804 through a slave revolt, Haiti was compelled to pay reparations to France, a financial burden that stifled its economy for decades. In the early 20th century, the United States occupied Haiti from 1915 to 1934, controlling its public finances and siphoning away around 40% of Haiti’s national income to service debt repayments. These interventions disrupted Haiti’s political and economic systems, leaving a legacy of instability and underdevelopment. ​ 

U.S. Immigration Policies and Racial Bias

The Trump administration’s immigration policies have been marked by a pattern of discrimination toward Haitian immigrants. In 2017, the administration announced the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians, affecting approximately 45,000 to 59,000 individuals. This decision was part of a broader strategy to cancel TPS for several countries, disproportionately impacting communities of color. ​ 

Furthermore, President Trump’s derogatory remarks about Haiti and African nations, reportedly referring to them as “shithole countries,” underscore a racial bias influencing policy decisions. These comments were met with widespread condemnation and highlight a disregard for the historical and socio-economic challenges faced by these nations. ​ 

Impact on Haitian Communities

The administration’s stance has had tangible effects on Haitian communities in the United States. In Miami, home to the largest Haitian diaspora, the revocation of humanitarian protections has caused fear and uncertainty. Community leaders emphasize the importance of faith and mutual support during these challenging times. ​ 

Additionally, the aggressive deportation policies have exacerbated existing crises. For instance, the deportation of Andry José Hernández Romero, a Venezuelan makeup artist, under the Alien Enemies Act, highlights the administration’s expansive use of executive power in immigration enforcement. ​ 

Conclusion

President Trump’s indifference to Haiti’s political turmoil and the administration’s immigration policies reflect a continuation of historical patterns of exploitation and racial bias by Western powers. Understanding this context is crucial to addressing the root causes of Haiti’s challenges and fostering more equitable international relations.